I suppose there is a certain satisfaction from hearing one’s own views confirmed. I plead guilty. This is delicious. This is from the web site, Get Aktiv.
This is the key sentence from the essay.
Extrapolated into another scenario, Friedman would no doubt argue that a corporate executive would be duty-bound to offshore their operations to low-cost developing countries wherever it maximised profits, and this should only be done at the very lowest possible labour rates allowed by law so as to maximise corporate profits, even if the developing country has no effective wage protection and it is exploitative of the workers, provided that doesn’t bring financial harm to the company through loss of reputation – indeed, to pay a more ‘humane’ or ‘reasonable’ wage to staff than the absolute minimum that could have been negotiated is a reflection of an executive not performing his duties to the company.
via Get Aktiv
I don’t see an actual argument in the “Get Aktiv” posting, other than an ad hominem attack on academics.
LikeLike
I think you are quite right. My guilty pleasure is now even more guilty. I better look around for a real argument. Thanks for commenting! jp
LikeLike
Hi guys, I plead guilty to not arguing my point with the academic rigour that Chris MacDonald would expect – my key points I felt were pretty clear and self-evident (and targeted not toward academia but towards the ‘man on the street’ who may start to think these issues through as a result of reading my piece). However, I always enjoy (and benefit) from these kinds of discussions, and so I’ve replied to Chris on my post – you may find it interesting to read some more of my thoughts there.
LikeLike