Absolutely, there should be international rules and they should be tough standards as well. A coal fired plant, wind energy, etc. have little change of crossing national borders but a nuclear disaster can travel across nation after nation.
(Another little factoid, advocates of nuclear power leave out. I, for one, believe that endangering lives and land in other nations is irresponsible behavior.)
James Pilant
From BBC –
French President Nicolas Sarkozy has called for clear international standards on nuclear safety in light of the ongoing crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant.
Speaking in Japan, he proposed that nuclear safety authorities from the G20 countries discuss the issue in May.
Radiation detected in the sea near the stricken plant has again risen steeply.
Meanwhile, the UN has advised Japan to consider expanding the evacuation zone around the reactors.
Mr Sarkozy is the first foreign leader to visit Japan following the earthquake and tsunami that hit the country on 11 March.
From further down in the article.
“The problem is more about establishing safety norms than it is about the choice of nuclear energy, for this there is no alternative right now,” Mr Sarkozy was quoted as saying by Reuters.
“We must address this anomaly that there are no international safety norms for nuclear matters. We want international standards because the world is a village and what happens in Japan can have consequences elsewhere.”
Hmmm… thats easy for the President of France to say. Is France going to enforce such rules? Are french tax payers going to pay to enforce these rules? How exactly does one make “tough standards” international? At the end of the day, the nations choose whether or not to conform to UN resolutions. Its usually the US taxpayer who pays for it when other countries step out of line.
LikeLike
France gets a very high proportion of its electricity from nuclear plants (78.8%) and has a large number of them (59). They would stand to lose more than any other country on earth from tightened nuclear regulation.
James Pilant
LikeLike
I’m not questioning his motives. What Im questioning is the logistic and legal feasibility of his idea. The underlying flaw of the UN is that it has no real enforcement power. It requires the individual members to police themselves and if someone steps out of line, another country (usually us) has to volunteer to spend billions to enforce punitive measures.
LikeLike
Yes, but not being willing to meet the standards would be a strong warning to neighboring countries that something is wrong.
LikeLike