Category: ethics

Sign Mortgage Documents, 500 In The Morning and 500 In The Afternoon, For Week After Week – Get A Brand New BMW Sport Utility Vehicle!

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business

So, there are rewards for signing documents without any concept, any inkling of what is in them! Now the poor stupid schmucks who bought the mortgage, they’re going to lose their homes and pay the losses based on almost random documentation. Is this a great country or what?

From the Huffington Post –

Florida authorities are investigating the law offices of David J. Stern over how it handled foreclosure paperwork. As the AP notes, Cheryl Salmons, an office manager at the law offices of David Stern, “would sign 500 files in the morning and another 500 files in the afternoon without reviewing them and with no witnesses,” according to Kelly Scott, a former assistant at the firm.

The perks for good performance were considerable, according to Scott’s statement. Tampa Online notes office employees were lavished with gifts:

“As a perk of Samons’ [sic.] job, Stern’s office would routinely pay her personal mortgage, a car payment, her electric bills and her cell phone bill, according to Scott, who told investigators Stern also bought Samons [sic.] a new BMW sport utility vehicle every year and gave her and other employees jewelry. Additionally, Stern purchased employee David Vargas a house, a car and a cell phone, Scott claims in her statement.”

I try to tell my students about reality. Sometimes, I wonder whether or not that is a good idea. I try to teach them to do what’s right. BMW Sport Utility Vehicles may well be a stronger argument than my moral exhortations.

Are any of these financial pirates going to pay anything bigger than a small fine? I doubt it.

Reality is dirty and messy. It tears your guts out. It means you live in a country where money is bigger than common decency, bigger than relationships, bigger than family, bigger than patriotism, – bigger than God. It is for a great many Americans, the only measure of success.

I challenge you to talk the language of morality, justice and Christianity and apply it to business and see how many uncomprehending looks you get or worse yet, the rolled eyes from the denizens of that strange ethereal plane, “the real world.”

But the “real world” bears the same resemblance to reality as the land of Oz. You see in reality, the vast majority of Americans live trying to do the right thing. In the “real world,” these people of honor are fools, marks to be taken, unrealistic clowns to be victimized by bank fees, credit card scams and every kind of bizarre internet rip off.

Millions of Americans work in jobs where they make less money than they could have in another field, they are teachers, firemen, policemen and soldiers. They live lives of service and sacrifice. This is just a joke in the “real world.”

I could go on.

But I suspect that anyone who claims to live in the “real world,” might not be someone you want to do business with.

I prefer those living lives of honor, those working in fields of service, those people trying to fulfill their duty to God and country, than the denizens, the predatory locusts of the “real world.”

James Pilant

Facebook Comments On My Post, “The Dumbest Quote For The Day.”

On By southwerkIn Capitalism, ethics

My post, The Dumbest Quote for the Day, attracted some comments on Facebook. Here’s my lead paragraph.

I teach in Northwest Arkansas. Students here tend to feel that because they are from Arkansas and go to a small college that they are going to have trouble competing with students from name schools. I always tell them that they are just as smart as students from anywhere in the country. As evidence of this, I point to the litany of stupidity, overreaching and greed by these graduates of name universities in the banking industy.

These gentlemen have commented on my posts before. They have a lot to say.

Here are their comments.

Andrew Gates I started my education at Georgia Southern University and am ending it at Georgia Tech. Its my opinion that students from smaller schools have more interaction with the real world. This makes them more prepared to handle, and manage, the real world. I would engineer for a company managed by one of your students before I would engineer under a harvard business grad, hands down!

Kevin Stebbings The problem is rather that they are too smart; they have not experienced limitations and therefore think they can model and manipulate a system which is truly outside their control. You may be setting your students up for failure to say they can compete with Harvard or MIT mathematicians. Believe me, I went to school with a handful that went on to those places and they SCARE me. Their intelligence is not to be downplayed or trifled with. In purporting an arm of the American dream here as you are, you are supporting the great lie that led some of these people to do the foolish things that they did. Knowing one’s place is better advice.

Andrew Gates Kevin: what if George Washington had given that advice to the Continental Congress? Where would we be? There is more to a man than just his intelligence. The human will is the catalyst for all great human accomplishments. I go to school with some guys that are more intelligent than me, and some that are less intelligent than me. The reason we have all made it this far is because what we lack in intelligence, we make up for, respectively, in sheer will power and hard work. There is no lie or falsehood in that idea of the American dream.

Kevin Stebbings I am quite and fully aware of that and was from the start. I would not argue that people should not try and I would not argue that sheer tested intelligence is all there is to it. Never, would I argue that. But my friend the American dream is both evil and a lie. Every highschool student who had read the Great Gatsby ought to know that. The American dream is a lie of the people in charge that keeps those beneath mentally enslaved; fighting for a dream that does not serve them….born ceaselessly back into the past or whatever the last line of that halfway tolerable book was.

Andrew Gates Ah. I see what you are saying. I think you confuse the idea of the American dream with the way in which it is used and manipulated.

I think one of the fundamental flaws shared by all of the most popular political and economic systems is that they all diverge from reality as the population size of the society grows. For instance, I think any small village of people (a few hundred people at most) can effectively operate as a market economy with relatively little problem. Likewise, I think another village of the same size can effectively operate as a communist society with relatively little problem.

The reason is because in that type of society, everyone knows everyone else. Interaction with your fellow villager is both imminent and necessary. You are much LESS likely to try and rip off a man when you know you have to see him on sunday at church or when you need something that he produces. A village is also much less tolerant of what it perceives to be immoral or unjust behavior when the village is small.

As a society grows in size and number, citizens become more and more anonymous in respect to each other. There is no way that any one American citizen personally knows even 0.001% of our population. This anonymity breeds apathy. This apathy, mixed with size of our society seems to dilute the impact that crime and immoral behavior has on the society as a whole. In a small village, a murder is a HUGE deal, because it could be the towns only doctor, or the towns only blacksmith, but in our society, that sense of urgency seems a little diluted because each citizen, more or less, is replaceable.

I said all of that to say that the idea of the American dream is not what the evil here. The idea that you can lead a happy life if you work hard and provide for yourself is, in of itself, a good idea in my opinion. The lack of moral behavior, especially from the rich and powerful, has led to them using this idea and twisting it into something it was never meant to be.

James Pilant I think very little of the “American Dream.” However, if you think I mean their education is the same, I’m not teaching that. I’m teaching that their inherent intelligence and what they can draw from their minds, their souls, is just as good as those people’s. jp

James Pilant I want to blog the whole thing!
jp

Andrew Gates Be my guest!

Gael O’Brien Reviews The Documentary – “Inside Job”

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, Economic measurement, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, White Collar Crime5 Comments

From the article –

While of course we know the outcome of the unfolding events Ferguson describes, his interviews with many of the players in the crisis provide additional insight into the larger question of how could so many very bright people be involved in a failure so huge? The film shows the consequences when thought capital is wrapped around the dogged pursuit of an ideology, in this case deregulation, so that conflicting data or opposing viewpoints are not allowed to interfere.

The band of men from Ivy League economics departments wielded a lot of power in the 30-year push for deregulation. They served as consultants to the industry and were selected for significant regulatory or White House advisor positions. Ferguson raises questions about their objectivity as scholars, as well as whether their integrity was compromised by conflicts of interest and accepting fees from Wall Street, or to testify before Congress, or as expert witnesses.

I’ve already written a recommendation style review of the documentary and this one is very positive as well.

You need to read it to get the full flavor of O’Brien’s prose.

James Pilant

Is A 398,264.69 Square Foot House Big Enough For You Or A Bit Much?

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Philosophy of Business

It’s bigger the the French Palace at Versailles. (Versailles is pictured at the left.)

Its price tag – One billion dollars (American).

Location – Mumbai

Owner – The Richest Man in India – Mukesh Ambani.

Named Anitlla, the entire structure is 27 stories high, although to be fair the first 6 floors are a 160-car garage.

From CBS Moneywatch –

The amenities are as extravagant as they are endless, but what would you expect from the fourth richest human on the planet? The most expensive house in the world has:

* Private gym
* Ballroom
* 50-seat movie theater
* Health spa
* Several swimming pools
* 3 helicopter pads

The house, well, building, also features small trees in the residence in an elevated garden with high ceilings.

Why?

I just don’t get it. (There’s room for 600 servants.) I don’t think I am ever going to get it.

Don’t be mistaken I don’t believe that he should give it all to charity, but isn’t there a point at which diminishing returns kicks in? I mean after the first 100,000 square feet, wasn’t there a pause? And then didn’t someone think at least in the back of their mind, “This is crazy?!”

Well, probably not. But I still don’t understand.

James Pilant

Mortgage Freeze Has Some Winners Too

On By southwerkIn Capitalism, ethics

If you are paying on your mortgage and you want to sell your house, a mortgage freeze buoys your prospects.

Here – Read – From CBS Moneywatch

The housing market just keeps getting uglier. Now we’re learning that not only did banks do a bad job of making loans, they’re also doing a bad job of foreclosing on them. So bad that we have a nation-wide freeze on foreclosures. But if you’ve been paying your mortgage and your house is for sale, the foreclosure freeze just made your house a lot more attractive to potential buyers.

Charlie Farrel’s explanation of the advantages is quite clear. If you own your own home and are thinking about selling, I’d give it a full read.

James Pilant

The Dumbest Quote for the Day

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, Teaching3 Comments

I teach in Northwest Arkansas. Students here tend to feel that because they are from Arkansas and go to a small college that they are going to have trouble competing with students from name schools. I always tell them that they are just as smart as students from anywhere in the country. As evidence of this, I point to the litany of stupidity, overreaching and greed by these graduates of name universities in the banking industy.

Well today, I got a new quote to use:

It’s not a surprise that we know we have crises every five or ten years. My daughter came home from school one day and said, ‘daddy, what’s a financial crisis?’ And without trying to be funny, I said, ‘it’s the type of thing that happens every five, ten, seven, years.’ And she said: ‘why is everybody so surprised?’ So we shouldn’t be surprised…

This is from JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimion. That’s right. You heard it clearly. This financial crisis is just “the type of thing that happens every five, ten, etc.” Do you mean the financial crisis that destroyed a large proportion of the value of American homes, came within an inch of destroying the international banking system and has put millions of people out of work? That one? It seems to me the others were a lot smaller – much, much, much smaller. I hope he is better in other aspects of teaching his children. The story of Santa Claus has more validity.

Mr. Dimion has an MBA from Harvard Business School. You see, my students are just as smart as their students. The evidence is clear. I don’t think I could get any of my students to claim that the current financial crisis is a kind of “seasonal” phenomenon and that we shouldn’t be surprised when the elite educated bankers screw up on in a manner barely conceivable in fiction.

James Pilant

(First published in January of this year.)

RECORD FINES = WHAT PATHETIC NONSENSE!!

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Government Failure, White Collar Crime

From the BBC –

Angelo Mozilo will pay the Securities and Exchange Commission $22.5m (£14.1m) and repay $45m of profits.

He is the highest profile executive to face charges relating to the US sub-prime mortgage crisis in 2007.

The SEC alleged he, with two colleagues, had failed to disclose risks that Countrywide was taking.

The civil charges related to claims he had misled the market by falsely assuring investors that Countrywide was a prime quality mortgage lender that had avoided the excesses of its competitors.

From 2001-2006, his compensation was 470 million dollars.

This is what passes for justice.

This is supposed to send a message.

This is supposed to be a nation under laws.

This is rubbish.

James Pilant

Do The Banks Have Proof Of Ownership?

On By southwerkIn business ethics, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, White Collar Crime

I’m not the only one who has suspicions that the banks might not have the necessary proof of ownership. Read the following from the Wall Street Journal –

Under a far gloomier scenario, the problems created by using robo-signers may be irrelevant if, instead of being lost, mortgage documents weren’t ever properly transferred during each step of the securitization process, says Adam Levitin, a professor of law at Georgetown University. If that happens, “the whole system comes to a halt,” he says. Investors could argue in court that they never owned the mortgages backing their money-losing securities.

Banks and their attorneys say such fears are overblown. Procedures for transferring loans into mortgage-backed securities “are sound and based on a well-established body of law governing a multi-trillion dollar secondary mortgage market,” said Tom Deutsch, the executive director of the American Securitization Forum, in a statement Friday.

I love that second paragraph. Here look at the key phrase, “Procedures for transferring loans into mortgage backed securities are sound and based on well established law…” Wow, you’d think the founding fathers were doing it! Well, this vast body of jurisprudence has existed since that grand old year of history, 2002? I doubt if any of it has been tested in court. His statement is more hopeful than true. You see the transfer of property is one of the most important procedures in the law. It’s surrounded over and over again by legal protections many of them requiring specific procedures. Now, you might ask me if during the Go Go years of financial mismanagement, the mid years of the first decade of this century, that the banks and their mortgage creating boiler rooms did all that proper procedure? Not a chance. Not even a little chance.

Some of the mortgage companies were giving out mortgages with NO capital of their own and Wall Street still bought them. If you’re giving people mortgages with not a single cent of your money on the line, how much do you care about good paperwork?

James Pilant

Will Congress Save The Banks By Dismissing The Ownership Rights Of Homeowners? – Senior Editor, John Carney Says They Will

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, Uncategorized

I’m cynical. You can’t have much to do with the field of business ethics and be anything else. I was outraged for days after Congress passed the act that would have legalized much of the mortgage industry’s wrong doing. When Obama vetoed it, I had a rare moment of gratitude. But I’m still cynical always waiting for the knife in the back, a sell out, a deal behind close doors … There is always someone waiting to make a deal no matter what crawling excreted maggot they have to deal with. Always someone.

But this guy is more cynical than I am. And he might be right. John Carney in an article entitled, “Sorry Folks, The Put-Back Apocalypse Ain’t Gonna Happen,” says that Congress will not let Bank of American get in real trouble.

Here’s an excerpt from this article –

But Bank of America’s recent decline—down almost 10% this week—is driven by fears that the bank could be hit with huge liabilities for faulty mortgage pools. And I’m pretty sure that is not going to happen.

Why not?

Because the politicians will not let the financial stability of the largest bank in the nation be threatened by contractual rights. Not when there’s an easy fix available that won’t cost taxpayers a dime.

Here’s what is going to happen: Congress will pass a law called something like “The Financial Modernization and Stability Act of 2010” that will retroactively grant mortgage pools the rights in the underlying mortgages that people are worried about. All the screwed up paperwork, lost notes, unassigned security interests will be forgiven by a legislative act.

He may be right. I’ll bet the other way. Fifty state Attorney Generals and countless other officials are on the prowl right now and bad stuff is coming out every minute. The Public is in a bad mood. Saving the banks under these circumstances could delegitimize our system of government in a way we haven’t seen before. It is true that people have virtually no faith in Congress and only somewhat more in the President. But that is different from active hate. It’s different because the government will essentially be putting a sign on its front lawn, “You have a dispute with a bank and you’re right – WRONG, bank wins. You’re less than nothing. Go home and suck it up.”

I don’t think that’s going to go over well. Further, I don’t think it will go away in time for 2012.

We’re about to see how much power public opinion has. John Carney says it does not have the power to stop Congress from saving the bank by abrogating their legal rights. Carney hopes he’s wrong about this. From his work, it is easy to see that he is no defender of the banking industry and, is probably, one of those people I speak of as a ally in the “good fight.” But I hope he is wrong too.

The possibilities of the results of such an action by the federal government offer only two possibilities, acceptance by the public or another kind of response. I am not happy with my speculations on what that response might be.

James Pilant

Banks Could Lose $80 Billion

On By southwerkIn business ethics, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, White Collar Crime

Analyst Dick Bove says the mortgage foreclosure crisis could cost the banks as much as $80 billion dollars. He is quoted in an article by Jeff Cox from CNBC.

Banks could face losses of over $80 billion from the foreclosure mess—not so much from the moratorium on home seizures but from the flood of homeowner and investor lawsuits likely to follow, analyst Dick Bove said Friday.

The lawsuits are likely to focus on “fraud at every level of the process”—from packaging mortgages into bonds to selling them to investors, the Rochdale Securities analyst said in a note to clients.

The legal fallout could cost the industry more than $80 billion, about 10 times the amount that Bove sees banks losing from the foreclosure halt itself.

I really like that phrase, “fraud at every level of the process.” It’s a beaut. It also sums up what has been going on for the last two years, and industry run amok.

James Pilant