Piotr Szczerek Takes Hat Meant for a Child

“If you were faster, You’d have it.” is a defense I haven’t heard before. And I seriously doubt that I will ever hear it again.

Piotr Szczerek is seen on film taking an autographed hat being handed to a child in the stands of a tennis match. If you have a minute I recommend you have a look at the video. I promise you that it does not leave a lot of room for doubt about what happened.

He seems a little sensitive while a tower of strength while dealing with small children, he seems a bit shy with adults. He has shut down his social media and has proclaimed loudly that he will sue anyone who criticizes him online.

(This illustration above is from “A Christmas Carol” and shows Scrooge being confronted by his former partner, Marley. It is no way meant to suggest that someone mentioned in the attached article has done something wrong and should be sorry.)

(The following four lines are supposed to be in the main body of the writing but WordPress has an unfortunate habit of “enlarging” my designated texts into anything nearby.)

As a business ethics author I can’t help but feel this might not be the best “look” for the CEO of a company.

His company web site is currently being “review bombed.”

Will there be other, more substantive consequences? That remains to be seen.

James Alan Pilant

For more information, please read the article linked to below. Quincy Thomas has written a good piece of journalism.

Quincy Thomas writing for “Where Is the Buzz,” had the following article: Polish Millionaire CEO Piotr Szczerek Reportedly Defends Snatching Kid’s Hat at US Open: “If You Were Faster, You’d Have It”

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/polish-millionaire-ceo-piotr-szczerek-184725888.html

The US Open has always attracted drama around it, but this time the drama was not on the court, rather in the stands. After Polish tennis pro Kamil Majchrzak secured the best victory in his life as he beat ninth-seeded Karen Khachanov in five thrilling sets, the player walked towards the stands to spread love. He autographed, waved, grinned, then took off his hat and particularly pointed towards a boy named Brock in the stands.

Others thought that this was one of those fan moments that kids will always remember throughout their life. But instead of that, this is another viral scandal.

Even before the boy could spread wide his arms, the adult male, Polish tycoon, pavement construction magnate, Piotr Szczerek, grasped the hat, thrust it into the pocket in the bag belonging to his wife, and walked away leaving the boy heart-broken as he yelled, “What are you doing?”

Hardcore Culture or the Absence of Western Values??

Hardcore Culture, a shift away from company loyalty to a “market based” culture. That doesn’t sound too bad, does it? Market based: Yeah, based on market forces, that’s okay, right? Or is it?

John Stankey has been making people “return to the office.”

(Quoted directly from the article linked to below.) The increasingly strict return-to-office mandate that AT&T has rolled out in phases over the past year has also resulted in further reductions, multiple employees have told Business Insider, and Stankey signaled in his memo that he’s fine with more people leaving if they’re not on board with the company’s new direction. (End quote.)

The information that we have, that is, the facts, say that working from home and other such flexible work ideas have led to greater employee satisfaction and productivity. So, why would you make people return to the office. It’s pretty clear, isn’t it. It is a return to the dictator style boss, the kick them in the teeth style boss epitomized by the yuppies in the 1980’s.

Apparently the investors are eating this stuff up. They love reduced work forces, corporate mandates and divesting the company from previous endeavors. And none of it has to make any sense, they are like toddlers strapped in a car seat, they enjoy the motion of the vehicle and that is enough. Thinking logically, critically or even trying to protect their money is hard while reacting positively to the supposedly alpha male characteristics of hard charging decisions, commands rather than cooperation, lots and lots of forced resignations and an emphasis on the perceived toughness of the CEO, well, that’s easy.

If you get the impression I don’t think much of the investment community, you would be right. But there is something far more alarming here but first let me quote my article about our star of a CEO.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/t-ceo-john-stankeys-hard-202422959.html

(Quoted from article above.) As the company moves to sunset most of its copper network in the US by the end of 2029, Stankey has also instituted a broad cultural shift internally. He’s moved away from prioritizing 20th-century corporate values like loyalty and tenure in favor of a tech-style, “more market-based culture,” the AT&T CEO wrote in a sweeping memo last week that was first reported by Business Insider. (End quote.)

So, here’s my concern. Where are Western Values in all of this? A giant corporation like this one is also a political and cultural entity. In this article, there is an almost complete absence of any issue or topic related to Western Values save capitalism and market economics, and then only in its cruelest and simplest form.

What are Western Values? They fall into six categories: (From Wikipedia with my thanks!)

Does AT&T have any stance on obeying the law or participating in democracy or pledging to pay its taxes like a good citizen?

Why is a bald statement celebrating naked power and greed a positive for investors? And at the same time, the absence of any commitment to a better society, a greater nation or an improved civilization, and this absence does not trouble the investors at all. In face, I think they regard the evasion of human and moral values as a positive.

I think every corporation in the United States has a duty to the law and to its fellow citizens. I think we should all be invested with the responsibility of creating and maintaining a civil society and a program for human and cultural development because that is what a great people do and we should above all things strive to be a great people.

James Alan Pilant

It is very, very simple. These Individuals are Criminals.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/man-bragged-fed-officer-mob-163846410.html

Jack Wade Whitton, Capital Rioter

I write about ethics and morality. When you write about basic right and wrong, words are important. And in the case above the words are very important, indeed.

From the article:

“Whitton looked for opportunities to attack: In his three documented assaults, he was either a leader or a solitary actor,” prosecutors wrote in a court filing. Videos show that contemporaneous attacks on police by Whitton and a co-defendant, Justin Jersey, “ignited the rageful onslaught of violence that followed” on the Lower West Terrace, prosecutors said. “As Whitton and Jersey commenced their assaults, the tenor of the crowd audibly changed,” they wrote. “Other rioters surged towards the Archway and joined the attack, throwing objects at the officers and striking at them with makeshift weapons such as a hockey stick, a pieces of wood, a flagpole, and a police riot shield.”

This was a very active member of a riot, we see words and phrases like “attack,” “rageful onslaught,” “throwing objects,” and there are some more. There were terrible acts that resulted in harm to policemen. And this particular individual has been sentenced for these crimes.

So, now you are asking (and you should), “James, where is your ethical issue? Why are we talking about this?”

To my disgust and astonishment, individuals like this fellow just sentenced have been described without any attempt at satire or irony as “hostages” and “political prisoners.”

No, these are criminals.

They were members of a violent mob hell bent on stopping the certification of 2020 election. That and the associated acts of violence and vandalism are all crimes.

These criminals deserve the penalties of the law that they broke. Period.

James Alan Pilant

Is Beauty a Business Ethics Value?

One man’s artistic wonderland, created secretly in rented apartment, given protected status (msn.com)

A U.K. Home Filled With Surreal Outsider Art Receives Protected Status (artnet.com)

When you drive down to the mall or along the city strip where the fast food stores lurk, you are often struck by the sterile sameness of it. You’re looking at a kind of scenery duplicated thousands of times all across the United States and to a lesser extent across the world. A great deal of end stage capitalism is devoid of creative and artistic merit because all values aside direct monetary value have been long ago discarded.

More than twenty years ago, I spent a year working the legal department of the Wal-Mart Home Office in Bentonville, Arkansas. You are no doubt well aware of the utter sameness of the store designs. They have a very distinctive look. So, you might assume that all the stores look the same. But you would be mistaken. While I was there Wal-Mart wanted to put a store in a particular city in California but the building codes did not allow for the typical design. So, they had to create a store to meet those codes. The design department was very proud of their new building and big beautiful drawings of the new store were placed on easels for employees to admire.

The new building was surrounded by shrubbery and extensive green lawns well back from the main drag. To drive to the parking lot you had to navigate meandering zig-zag roads designed to keep you at a very low speed for pedestrian friendliness. The building itself was red brick faced or actually brick in design, very elegant looking something like an upscale bank.

So, even Wal-Mart was willing to spend the time and money to build a good looking store, a tribute to the community, a recognition that there are community values beyond simple profit. I’m sure they didn’t like it being who they are — but they complied.

It is important the we realize we don’t have to live in sterile sameness. We don’t have to live in pedestrian hostile environments. We don’t have to live in a community that looks just like the community up the street and everywhere else in America.

We can live where people can walk in safety, where bicyclists can ride to work without fear. We can live in an environment full of flowers, trees, healthy shrubs surrounded by nature. And above all we can do our buying and spend our time in buildings full of art and beauty.

There once was a fellow named Ron Gittins. He lived in a apartment for many years and during her time there he built it into a temple of beauty. The links are above. Look at what he did. This is now a protected site. It is in Britain. We in the United States would do well to create protected sites like this.

Why did he transform property that he didn’t even own in such a dramatic way? I tend to believe that he couldn’t stand the ordinary, that his life and his soul yearned for greater things. And you might realize at this point in the essay, that you too desperately yearn for high values and greater things. We all do.

The pursuit of profit, the bizarre and troubling worship of the free market, is a wrecking ball to many of the values in this nation. Our churches have become “mega-churches” where political power and connections are pursued. Our colleges and universities increasingly build dorms and facilities to attract a higher paying customer as if learning and a life of learning was only valuable if it could be immediately turned into a salary. I see ad after ad talking about art as the newest safe investment for retirement. I see young men and women looking for mates based on their lifetime earning potential and while I was in law school observed the my male comrades were actively planning to to trade up wives just as soon as the money got good. It is depressing.

We don’t have to live a life as money grubbing barbarians. The liberal arts, an appreciation of painting, sculpture, music and architecture enriches not only our lives but every other life we touch. We might also actually cultivate friendship and love based not on economic advantage but actual honest relationships. Just saying.

Think of Ron Gittins. He didn’t make art in his apartment for money. He created because humans, the whole, developed kind, need to create and to make value.

That the pursuit of money at all costs would deny the creation of the whole human being, so important to our civilization is one the strongest argument that we must develop a more nuanced economic system. And we need to start creating it now if we are going to preserve the values of real importance in our society.

James Alan Pilant

America’s government shutdown: No way to run a country

Pablo Picasso, 1937, Guernica, protest against...
Pablo Picasso, 1937, Guernica, protest against Fascism (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

I was going to quote a paragraph from this. And then after reading it a while, I decided to quote four paragraphs. And then, I just decided this is just excellent writing and quoting a piece out of it was like slicing up a Picasso.
James Pilant

 

 

 

wa8dzp's avatarDewayne-Net Archives

[Note:  This item comes from friend Mike Cheponis.  DLH]

From: Michael Cheponis <michael.cheponis@gmail.com>
Subject: America’s government shutdown: No way to run a country | The Economist
Date: October 4, 2013 4:46:01 PM PDT

No way to run a country
The Land of the Free is starting to look ungovernable. Enough is enough
Oct 5 2013
<http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21587211-land-free-starting-look-ungovernable-enough-enough-no-way-run-country>

AS MIDNIGHT on September 30th approached, everybody on Capitol Hill blamed everybody else for the imminent shutdown of America’s government. To a wondering world, the recriminations missed the point. When you are brawling on the edge of a cliff, the big question is not “Who is right?”, but “What the hell are you doing on the edge of a cliff?”

The shutdown itself is tiresome but bearable. The security services will remain on duty, pensioners will still receive their cheques and the astronauts on the International Space Station will still…

View original post 623 more words

A Song For Occupy Wall Street

Nathan Shaffer – Come Back America – YouTube

(Something I found on You Tube – You can buy the music and other works by the artist online.)

Sometimes the music has a message.
Enhanced by Zemanta

“Visionary works of art inspired by blind rage” (via NewSong40)

This is a really fascinating post from an obviously well read author. The insights there are very appealing and display a clever imagination.

But you might go there just to see the picture (thumbnail below). That was my first thought. I have another from this set of artists on my wall in the living room of my home.

James Pilant

Special thanks to NewSong40.

"Visionary works of art inspired by blind rage" So ran the headline of the advertising blurb for a documentary by Andrew Lloyd Webber in last week’s TV guide. The documentary was part of ITV’s “Perspectives” season and was entitled A passion for the pre-Raphaelites. “The Industrial Revolution:” the blurb continued, “A turning point for mankind but not necessarily for the better. Mass productivity went together with mass poverty. Soaring profits saw soaring prostitution. And increasing mechanis … Read More

via NewSong40