We are in a War of Ideology (via Chink In The Armor)

The web site, Chink in the Armor, is not for the faint hearted. The outrage bubbles. The anger seethes.

Fairly often, my rage bubbles up when I am writing about these business ethical lapses. He has more anger than I have and I have a lot.

I am just putting down the first sentence and then the first paragraph of this gentleman’s post –

I am pissed. I am seriously pissed. And here are some of the things I am seriously pissed about

1) My daughter will probably NEVER see her 87 year old grandfather again because we live on the left side of this country and he lives on the right side. What with the implementation of the Gestapo/Stasi/TSA Fascist Police State, we will NEVER travel on the airlines again. It is my responsibility to protect my child from evil and she will NOT be subjected to her first cavity search by the Goons of the TSA. Feel the Love.

Go here for the rest.

I think that is a fair representation of the writing. I want you to read it. I like anger. I don’t think there is enough out there.

James Pilant

P.S. I have looked over this web site for some more information about the writer, you know, the kind of stuff you find on the back of a book. I didn’t come up with any. If the author would like to let me know about this, I will be happy to expand this blog entry to include or create a brand new post.

TSA (Transportation Security Administration) Joke!

It's a "groper!"
What does TSA stand for?

“The Sexual Assailants.”

I love it!

James Pilant

I Was Wrong – The TSA (Transportation Security Administration) Should Be Abolished

When the humiliating scanners and grope searches were put in place, I believed that the government could be convinced to make changes that would respect human dignity and American rights.

It has become evident that the government from the President on down, have no interest in having a discussion on the issue. They have made it clear that they will not change course.

Their response to the legitimate claims of American citizens have been a rush of public officials and “so called” security experts to explain that this is absolutely necessary and that those who oppose these measures do not understand the dangers. At every point in this series of events, those criticizing the policies have been insulted, marginalized and ridiculed.

I have predicted and I firmly believe that the government’s next step will be to blame people with views like mine of empowering the terrorists.

Based on my observations of what has happened so far, it is now evident that private screening companies are far more amenable to public opinion and criticism than the government of the United States.

The government has taken the position that criticism on this issue is the result of internet activists and paranoid zealots.

I have long been a critic of private industry and the common abuse of citizens by exorbitant fees and other wrong doing.

But the government has indicated through its actions that criticism is not acceptable.

It is as if the government itself were a private corporation acting as if its actions were merely its own concern.

This is wrong.

Destroying this regulatory agency will be an important signal to the government to heed the people of the United States and their legitimate concerns.

I do not believe that this administration has any interest in middle class Americans, their struggles or their concerns.

James Pilant

(Subtitle From MSNBC) – Union That Represents Airport Screeners Urges Agency To Protect Employees

From MSNBC written by Harriet Baskas

The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the union that represents TSA workers, is urging the TSA to do more to protect its employees from abuse from airline passengers angry over the new security methods. The union reports that some members “have reported instances in which passengers have become angry, belligerent and even physical with TSOs (transportation security officers). In Indianapolis, for example, a TSO was punched by a passenger who didn’t like the new screening process,” the union said in a Nov. 17 statement posted on its website.

Let me get this straight, you subject passengers to x-rays, look at them nude, sometimes strip search them and often grope their buttocks and genitals, and you’re surprised they get mad?

Let’s read some more –

Union President John Gage called on TSA to provide an educational pamphlet to each passenger describing both their rights and the details of the new procedures, which include full-body scans and enhanced pat-downs.

“This absence of information has resulted in a backlash against the character and professionalism of TSOs,” said Gage in a statement. “TSA must act now — before the Thanksgiving rush — to ensure that TSOs are not being left to fend for themselves.”

You guys just don’t get it. What is causing you trouble is that the passengers understand all too well what is happening. Where did you get the idea that giving people a pamphlet would make them feel all better about being groped?

“Our concern is that the public not confuse the people implementing the policies with the people who developed the policies,” said Sharon Pinnock, the union’s director of membership and organization.

You’re doing the groping. You are not some passive government official sending a tax bill. You are depriving passengers of their dignity. Does the idea, the concept, that your higher ups told you to do this and that you think that you are not responsible give you comfort? You are responsible for your own actions. You are not justified by someone giving you orders. Not ever.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Monday the government will take into account the public’s concerns and complaints as it evaluates airport security measures. He says TSA procedures will continue to evolve.

This sentence is fun to explain. This is what it means, “A bunch of you are mad, so I am speaking a totally, utterly, meaningless sentence, so that you being obviously stupid since you don’t agree with our policies, will go away and trouble us no more. This is particularly important because if you disrupt traffic on Thanksgiving, you might call attention to your claims and force us to make changes. If we can only stall you by talking about “evolving procedures,” your moment of opportunity will pass and you will return to politically hopeless activity like writing letters to your congressmen.”

From further down in the article –

Aviation and security blogger Steven Frischling said he has received comments from TSA front-line screeners complaining of verbal abuse.

“Molester, pervert, disgusting, an embarrassment, creep. These are all words I have heard today at work describing me. …These comments are painful and demoralizing,” one unnamed TSO posted on Frischling’s website.

Another said: “Being a TSO means often being verbally abused. You let the comments roll off and check the next person; however, when a woman refuses the scanner then comes to me and tells me that she feels like I am molesting her; that is beyond verbal abuse.”

Molester, pervert, disgusting, an embarrassment, creep. I bet those words hurt. They’re accurate. You are performing unethical acts. Searching a prisoner at a medium security facility is understandable. These are felons who have forfeited their rights. You are searching innocent Americans as if they were vile and without humanity.

“Instead of making this Wednesday National Opt-Out Day in which a bunch of self-appointed guardians of liberty slow down the line for everyone by asking for pat-downs,” said Baker, “maybe what we need is a day when everyone who goes through the line says, ‘Thanks for what you do.’ ”

Every American citizen has a responsibility to defend our rights and liberty, and if you think I am going to thank a mindless drone who demeans and dehumanizes my fellow Americans, you’re going to wait a long time.

“Self appointed guardian of liberty.” That’s all you’ve got. That’s it! You’re so wrong that insults are all that remain. Are you so afraid that you cannot deal with criticism or is it the idea that your embrace of fear has left you without the ability to have an actual discussion about what is reasonable?

At every step of the way the government has said it will not change policy and that those who criticize it are ill informed and a tiny minority. Now, we have arrived at insults. In a few days, people like me will be accused of endangering and, if there is an incident, of murdering my fellow citizens.

This is all you’ve got. You can’t defend your actions based on the facts or our laws, so you appeal to insults and fears. That’s all you’ve got.

James Pilant

Body Scanner Manufacturers Spread A Little Lobbying Money!

Scanned, once too often!
Fredreka Schouten writing for USA Today says –

The companies with multimillion-dollar contracts to supply American airports with body-scanning machines more than doubled their spending on lobbying in the past five years and hired several high-profile former government officials to advance their causes in Washington, government records show.

L-3 Communications, which has sold $39.7 million worth of the machines to the federal government, spent $4.3 million trying to influence Congress and federal agencies during the first nine months of this year, up from $2.1 million in 2005, lobbying data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics show. Its lobbyists include Linda Daschle, a former Federal Aviation Administration official.

Rapiscan Systems, meanwhile, has spent $271,500 on lobbying so far this year, compared with $80,000 five years earlier. It has faced criticism for hiring Michael Chertoff, the former Homeland Security secretary, last year. Chertoff has been a prominent proponent of using scanners to foil terrorism. The government has spent $41.2 million with Rapiscan.

Obviously, the TSA bought those scanners to protect Americans from threat, enriching well heeled manufacturers was just an after thought. I, mean, considering their ham handed arrogance so far, there can be little doubt that they do what they want. The President won’t even get in the way.

James Pilant

President Obama Understands Your Frustrations!

From Huffington Post

President Barack Obama has asked security officials whether there’s a less intrusive way to screen U.S. airline passengers than the pat-downs and body scans causing a holiday-season uproar.

That is not what he asked. Further down in the article, they say what he actually asked, which was, “Is there another way to catch a bomber like the Nigerian man who had explosives in his underwear?” And his experts said no.

For now, they’ve told him there isn’t one, the president said Saturday in response to a question at the NATO summit in Lisbon.

But there are some other questions, President Obama could be asking. For instance, should the American security establishment always focus on the last attack? Since that enables terrorists to literally “call the tune.” They decide what security we deploy. You think that’s overstated?

Let me try it out on you. I take a toothbrush into the lavatory and with the sharpened decorative star off my cowboy boots cut it into a makeshift but entirely effective shiv. I then cart this thing back into the plane and get caught. Do you think you’ll be carrying a toothbrush onto an American plane for the foreseeable future? Don’t get me started on the cowboy boots.

I want you to picture five guys, Middle Eastern or not, having those kinds of discussions, not what will succeed in harming an aircraft but what will make the Americans do stupid things ceaselessly demeaning their citizens.

“I understand people’s frustrations,” Obama said, while acknowledging that he’s never had to undergo the stepped-up screening methods.

He feels your pain but not directly.

Passengers at some U.S. airports must pass through full-body scanners that produce a virtually naked image. If travelers refuse, they can be forced to undergo time-consuming fingertip examinations, including of clothed genital areas and breasts, by inspectors of the same sex as the passenger.

My general perception is that body cavity searches are the one frontier left for the intrepid explorers of the TSA.

Obama said he’s told the U.S. Transportation Security Administration: “You have to constantly refine and measure whether what we’re doing is the only way to assure the American people’s safety. And you also have to think through, are there ways of doing it that are less intrusive.”

He implied to them that they should make it better.

At this point, that agency and counterterrorism experts have told him that the current procedures are the only ones that they think can effectively guard against threats such as last year’s attempted Christmas-day bombing. A Nigerian man is accused of trying to set off a bomb hidden in his underwear aboard a flight from Amsterdam with nearly 300 people aboard.

So, let me get this straight, we have organized our entire TSA screening process as if another person was going to wear a bomb in his underwear?

Obama said that in weekly meetings with his counterterrorism team, “I’m constantly asking them whether is what we’re doing absolutely necessary, have we thought it through, are there other ways of accomplishing it that meet the same objectives.”

For now it sounds like there aren’t, and travelers will face potential pat-downs and scans.

“One of the most frustrating aspects of this fight against terrorism is that it has created a whole security apparatus around us that causes huge inconvenience for all of us,” Obama said.

No, you are creating a vast security apparatus and you’re not asking the right questions, just the conventional ones.

The President has the power to say, stop. The President has the power to say, “This is one step too far. We don’t have to sacrifice our dignity and our honor to our fear.”

Don’t hold your breath for that one.
James Pilant

Will New Technology Fix The TSA Scandal?

What if you could walk through that airport body scanner, pause for the camera, and know that your naked image would never be pored over by human eyes? If it was software, not TSA screeners, who searched you and other passengers for possible explosives?

That’s the vision of Transportation Security Administration head John Pistole. At a Senate hearing yesterday, Georgia Republican Johnny Isakson conjured this future and suggested to Pisole, “It looks like technology can be a solution to the privacy issue.” Pistole responded, “I think so, I’m very hopeful in that regard.”

The lead two paragraphs from an Atlantic Monthly story written by Alexis Madrigal. Mr. Madrigal them goes on to explain why this is probably never going to happen.

From the article

While vendors like L-3 and Rapiscan are actively trying to come up with a magic technological solution for the TSA, independent experts on body scanning technology and automated threat detection aren’t nearly as optimistic as the TSA head. Setting aside the question of how much real safety would be afforded by body scanners that use algorithms to detect artfully hidden explosives under someone’s clothes (I’ll leave it to our big guns to debate that point), there are fundamental problems that may make it very difficult to deploy them.

This is an excellent description of how the technology used in scanning works. I heartily recommend it.

There is no magic bullet.

Currently our actions are terrorist driven. Have one terrorist hide an explosive near his genitals and suddenly millions of Americans are having the genitals groped by the unfriendly hand of the government.

Tell me, what are we going to do if a terrorist hides the explosive more internally? Do you really want to meet your friendly TSA employee while he’s putting on the rubber gloves?

Let’s stop the nonsense now.

James Pilant

TSA (Transportation Security Administration) ABUSES – How Many Before Someone Does Something?

Tell me. How many terrorists has the TSA caught?

Hmm, would that be zero?

Oh yeah, that’s the number.

So, why are we stripping you with technology or groping you up?

I don’t know. Maybe you should ask?

James Pilant

No More X-Rated Searches!!@!

Do you really need to pass through a machine that looks at every square centimeter of your body to make airlines safer? Do you really have to (for all intents and purposes) pose nude for the airline cops? And if you refuse to pose nude, should they be able to grope you like some felon assaulting a schoolgirl on a subway in Japan?

Forbes proposes abolishing the TSA, which is, of course, nonsense. Forbes has never had too many rational thoughts. I consider them finding nude searches to be irrational and demeaning more the accident of them having to ride airplanes than from any actual concern for other human beings. In fact, I am reluctant to quote these doctrinaires but I think you and I will survive this once.

From Forbes –

For fiscal conservatives, it’s hard to come up with a more wasteful agency than the TSA. For privacy advocates, eliminating an organization that requires you to choose between a nude body scan or genital groping in order to board a plane should be a no-brainer.

But won’t that compromise safety? I doubt it. The airlines have enormous sums of money riding on passenger safety, and the notion that a government bureaucracy has better incentives to provide safe travels than airlines with billions of dollars worth of capital and goodwill on the line strains credibility. This might be beside the point: in 2003, William Anderson incisively argued that some of the steps that airlines (and passengers) would have needed to take to prevent the 9/11 disaster probably would have been illegal.

The odds of dying from a terrorist attack are much lower than the odds of dying from doing any of a number of incredibly mundane things we do every day. You are almost certainly more likely to die or be injured driving to the airport than you are to be injured by a terrorist once you’re in the air, even without a TSA. Indeed, once you have successfully made it to the airport, the most dangerous part of your trip is over. Until it’s time to drive home, that is.

Boy, these guys can take a matter of personal dignity and come up with, “Let’s get rid of a public agency! We can find a corporation to come to the rescue! Give us public money now! Now!”

Okay, personal dignity. Do these kinds of searches make us safer? Probably not.

These kinds of searches are more the kind of thing we subject prison inmates to. I fully agree that if all airline passenger are convicted felons, the searches are merited. Are we all one step away from being criminals stopped only by a little humiliation? (Okay, a heaping big helping of humiliation.)

We have given up our internet privacy, our financial privacy, been subjected to camera surveillance all in the name of safety. At what point, are you going to say stop? When they mount camera’s in your home? in your bathroom? implant chips in your children?

Let’s stop them. This has become insane, crazy, just plain loco.

Do we want people around the world to decide that Americans are witless cattle willing to undergo any indignity, any loss of rights because of 20,000 scumbags hiding in caves in North Pakistan?

I think Americans are brave and resourceful. I have never believed that we needed to give up any rights at all in this struggle. These criminals are just a small band of criminals. Those that advocate a war with Islam can’t think and can’t count. There are a billion and a half Muslims. A good number don’t like us, that is not a crime. The organization that attacked us is tiny and we can handle this without this kind of surrender to our worst fears and instincts.

We’re Americans! Did the Kaiser, the Nazis, Tojo’s Japan, or Mussolini scare us into naked searches or genital groping?

No, they didn’t. We have courage. That’s why we have been successful as a nation. When we give up courage, what’s left to fight for?

James Pilant