There are few assaults upon our dignity as crushing as the theft of all of our possessions. It is not so much the large items like refrigerators and televisions that are missed. Humans attach value to the strangest things. Instead of the microwave they lament the loss of their wedding pictures. When logic would dictate the loss of the computer should be the first cause of regret, they think of the old worn chair that has sat in the living room for years. Considering the great value placed upon personal privacy and possessions, would it not seem logical and prudent that those entrusted with the safety of the public should investigate and seek to punish the guilty. But the investigators would only need a mirror to discover the perpetrator of this crime, law enforcement itself.
It seems unfair that the bank never has to worry about these mistakes in judgment. It seems unfair that the bank, should use so many public resources to serve its interests.
The victim is asking $500,000 dollars in damages.
That seems fair, first, to recompense her for damages and second, to discourage the sheriff and his deputies from any more random home raids.
James Pilant
via Foreclosure Fraud – Fighting Foreclosure Fraud by Sharing the Knowledge

There was a question about law enforcement which says something like this; “Law enforcement are the one’s who is protecting us from criminals, what if the the criminals are the law enforcers? Who will protect us from them?”
LikeLike
Did you see “Watchmen?” It was the same philosophical argument – who will protects us from our protectors?
James Pilant
LikeLike
I read through that but may have missed the part where the banks had any influence on the actual facility costs.
LikeLike