Community Improvement District Lets Business Impose Sales Tax For Improvements

From KAKE in Wichita, Kansas

Owners of a popular east Wichita shopping center want to make improvements. In turn, they want shoppers to pay more in sales tax.

Eastgate Shopping Center at Kellogg and Rock Road will ask the Wichita City Council to establish a Community Improvement District for the area. Plans call for facade renovations, and parking and store improvements.

The cost for the project will run more than $53 million. Eastgate developers say a one cent sales tax would be in place over a 22 year period to pay for the renovations.


A privately owned shopping center can petition the city to impose a tax and give it to them?

Is the private becoming the public? or the public, the private?

Tax money will directly pay for improvements to this shopping center in the form of a sales tax. Is this wise? At what point does a government cease being government of the people and morphs into a subsidiary of private interests offering its citizens up for their business value?

The one thing that I find most ironic is that Kansas is considering cutting its corporate tax rate, but it is okay for a business to apply for and receive a tax increase on the citizens of that same state.

James Pilant

7 thoughts on “Community Improvement District Lets Business Impose Sales Tax For Improvements

  1. I couldn’t agree with you more. The community improvement district concept has some good applications, but it’s beginning to be just as self-serving and foolish as most of the tax increment financing (TIF) we see where I am.

    While most of us don’t miss that extra penny per dollar, for example, that we pay for a nice dinner, it’s yet another instance of the private sector reaping direct economic benefit from taxpayers when no public purpose is demonstrated.

    Further, in this instance, obviously the stores are there already so the “improvements” they seek are simply facelifts to help them keep up with the competition.

    A worthy goal in underserved communities, perhaps, but not $53 M of facade renovations and general sprucing up.


  2. Joni Green

    A couple of friends visited a new restaurant located near Central and Oliver. Their ticket reflected an additional “CID” tax of 1%. When they questioned it the server had no explanation. The manager/owner came over and told them is was a “development tax” that helps develop and improve the area, he said the the other restaurants near there were also charging the tax. However, when we checked with them they did not know anything about it. I checked with the State of Kansas Division of Taxation/Revenue and they told me they had not heard of this, but if they were charging an additional tax % it shouldn’t be called out separately, but should be included in their original tax rate. They also told me that we could look up their tax rate by address on the Kansas website. We looked up their address and it said their tax rate was the normal 7.3%. How do we know if a business is legitimately charging a CID tax? And I agree, it’s a weird feeling to pay more tax at one place opposed to another. Doesn’t seem like “good” business to me :/


  3. Pingback: Joni Green Comments on “Community Improvement District Lets Business Impose Sales Tax” | Pilant's Business Ethics Blog

  4. Pingback: Joni Green Comments on "Community Improvement District Lets Business Impose Sales Tax" | Pilant's Business Ethics

  5. Hi!
    Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be ok. I’m
    undoubtedly enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.


Comments are closed.