Image via Wikipedia
Comment: Putting religious group’s campaign against contraception into context | McClatchy
I was following my daily reading ritual beginning with Beat the Press, the next six, and then finishing with Slate. McClatchy (fifth) is always interesting often going where the regular news media do not.
Sometimes, you read an article that is particular useful to your thinking (and one that I wish I had written myself).
This article puts the recent drive by fundamentalist and Catholic denominations to limit reproductive freedom, more precisely, contraception. The essay discusses the history of previous attempts of religion to limit rights. I was aware of these but had never thought of viewing the recent events in context.
I want to give credit to Sarah Lipton-Lubet of American Civil Liberties Union for building my understanding of the issue.
Here’s a paragraph from the story (link at the bottom of the page) –
Remarkably, contraception has recently come under attack with new vigor. Earlier this year, the House of Representatives voted to eliminate Title X, the federal program that makes contraception accessible to low-income people throughout the country, and to defund Planned Parenthood’s family planning work. Mississippi was contemplating a constitutional amendment that would outright ban some of the most common forms of birth control. And now, important new federal guidelines that will ensure insurance plans include coverage of contraception are being targeted.
Once again, I thank the author.
- Occupy protesters declare Goldman Sachs guilty, get arrested | McClatchy (mbcalyn.com)
- A Conniption Over Contraception (andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com)
- The absurd attack on contraceptives (salon.com)
- IUDs for free: Will new insurance coverage make the intrauterine device America’s favorite contraceptive? (slate.com)
- Christianism Watch (andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com)
- Why Conservatives Should Support Mandatory Contraception Coverage (alan.com)