Category: business ethics

White House Refuses To Act! Administration Will Not Call For Foreclosure Freeze!

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, Corporate Social Responsibility, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, White Collar Crime2 Comments

What a shock! The White House siding with the banks! Who would have thought it? Well, me. I was shocked the President pocket vetoed the legislation that would have retroactively made the banks false affidavits a non problem, but I needn’t have worried this meant a change of policy.

The banks will be protected. Homeowners are not that big a deal, but banks, no matter what they’re doing (unethical, illegal, cruel, vicious, incompetent- those things), will be protected.

Well, the President figured he’d stand firm, conduct a cursory investigation, which would be kept well in hand, and it would all go away.

Wrong, the crisis keeps rolling and keeps getting bigger.

Now, listen up, this is not the fault of Rahm Emanuel, Larry Summers, the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, or the Fed. The President of the United States is making these decisions. There is only one guy in charge at the White House and unless they’re holding his family hostage, he is the architect of his own decisions.

The President once said, “My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.” How about, “and the law, and justice and accountability?”

I think those ought to be in there too.

Well, the crisis continues. This is Jill Schlesinger from CBS’ Moneywatch –

Banks are against the moratorium because it could call into question larger documentation issues, which could in turn put the nation’s biggest financial institutions on the hook for breaches of representations and warranties made to buyers of mortgage-backed securities. If there were a breach, the buyers of the loans in question could “put back” the loans to the banks, forcing the banks to repurchase them for face value or to make the owner of the mortgage whole for the losses incurred. Some analysts have estimated the potential cost of putbacks to banks to be over $100 billion.

Let’s talk about this “putback” thing a little bit. Soon, you may hear about little else in the news!

You see the banks unloaded all these nasty securities packages on pensions funds, etc., selling them as if they were good values without disclosing their inherent flaws because the purchasers were “knowledgeable investors,” a legal status that is essentially a license for investment banks to lie to them. If the banks misrepresented these loans, the pension funds, etc. can demand their money back. What terrible thing could the bank have lied about that would get them in trouble? Well, they might have told the buyer that they owned the mortgages when they didn’t have the actual documents of ownership. Whoops! One hundred billion dollars! That a lot of money.

Remember that phrase, “putback.”

James Pilant

Sign Mortgage Documents, 500 In The Morning and 500 In The Afternoon, For Week After Week – Get A Brand New BMW Sport Utility Vehicle!

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business

So, there are rewards for signing documents without any concept, any inkling of what is in them! Now the poor stupid schmucks who bought the mortgage, they’re going to lose their homes and pay the losses based on almost random documentation. Is this a great country or what?

From the Huffington Post –

Florida authorities are investigating the law offices of David J. Stern over how it handled foreclosure paperwork. As the AP notes, Cheryl Salmons, an office manager at the law offices of David Stern, “would sign 500 files in the morning and another 500 files in the afternoon without reviewing them and with no witnesses,” according to Kelly Scott, a former assistant at the firm.

The perks for good performance were considerable, according to Scott’s statement. Tampa Online notes office employees were lavished with gifts:

“As a perk of Samons’ [sic.] job, Stern’s office would routinely pay her personal mortgage, a car payment, her electric bills and her cell phone bill, according to Scott, who told investigators Stern also bought Samons [sic.] a new BMW sport utility vehicle every year and gave her and other employees jewelry. Additionally, Stern purchased employee David Vargas a house, a car and a cell phone, Scott claims in her statement.”

I try to tell my students about reality. Sometimes, I wonder whether or not that is a good idea. I try to teach them to do what’s right. BMW Sport Utility Vehicles may well be a stronger argument than my moral exhortations.

Are any of these financial pirates going to pay anything bigger than a small fine? I doubt it.

Reality is dirty and messy. It tears your guts out. It means you live in a country where money is bigger than common decency, bigger than relationships, bigger than family, bigger than patriotism, – bigger than God. It is for a great many Americans, the only measure of success.

I challenge you to talk the language of morality, justice and Christianity and apply it to business and see how many uncomprehending looks you get or worse yet, the rolled eyes from the denizens of that strange ethereal plane, “the real world.”

But the “real world” bears the same resemblance to reality as the land of Oz. You see in reality, the vast majority of Americans live trying to do the right thing. In the “real world,” these people of honor are fools, marks to be taken, unrealistic clowns to be victimized by bank fees, credit card scams and every kind of bizarre internet rip off.

Millions of Americans work in jobs where they make less money than they could have in another field, they are teachers, firemen, policemen and soldiers. They live lives of service and sacrifice. This is just a joke in the “real world.”

I could go on.

But I suspect that anyone who claims to live in the “real world,” might not be someone you want to do business with.

I prefer those living lives of honor, those working in fields of service, those people trying to fulfill their duty to God and country, than the denizens, the predatory locusts of the “real world.”

James Pilant

Financial Roulette – America Loses

On By southwerkIn business ethics

Twenty percent of the American economy is the financial sector, the largest proportion in all of history.

For most of American history, banking was a vital part of economic growth. Bank loans provided the capital for small businesses and government to build factories, stores, highways and other public works. This is no longer the bank’s major function. While bank lending is still a critical part of the function of banks as far as the welfare of the nation is concerned, the profits are elsewhere.

It is hardcore speculation, casino capitalism, where the real money is made. This is not wealth creation, it is more similar to the board game, monopoly, you try to make money speculating on property although in the modern sense this is more likely stocks, mutual funds, derivatives, etc. This is not a benefit to the economy. It is a drag and a danger to the larger economy. When the financial sector loses, the taxpayer picks up the losses, while taxpayers share nothing in the winnings. This is because the nation insures deposits and because changes in the law in 1999 allows banks to speculate with these federally insured funds – Corporate welfare on a scale of trillions of dollars.

This gambling has far reaching societal effects. Those who benefit from this no way to lose game make more and more money while those who insure them against loss make less and less.

From the New York Times Article – Scrutinizing the Elite, Whether They Like It or Not –

Olivier Godechot, a French academic on the sociology panel, presented research that quantified just how skewed the increase in wealth at the very top has become. Mr. Godechot, a researcher at the National Center for Scientific Research in France, said that two professions — finance and business services — accounted for almost all of the increase in income inequality.

Professor Godechot has put his finger on it. Our society has focused, fixated on finance as the only mode of economic growth. Everything else from services to manufacturing are poor relations whose share in the wealth and even the concern of the government continues to dwindle.

Because of these changes we have an enormous inequality of income in the United States. From wikipedia –

Americans have the highest income inequality in the rich world and over the past 20–30 years Americans have also experienced the greatest increase in income inequality among rich nations. The more detailed the data we can use to observe this change, the more skewed the change appears to be… the majority of large gains are indeed at the top of the distribution.

The big incomes in America are strongly aligned with the world of finance. So, many of the great incomes in the United States are associated with a socially negative activity that not only produces no value to the large economy but actively endangers the economy through its taxpayer guaranteed bets.

It this wasn’t bad enough, hundreds of thousands of graduates from the most expensive and prestigious universities in the United States pursue careers in this field often starting at a quarter of a million dollars in annual salary, a massive diversion of talent from every other field of endeavor. So, our focus on finance weakens the nation and diverts its future leadership into the same unproductive path resulting in further devastating losses to society as a whole.

What can be done? Well, we could consider making things. We could make actual products in this country, televisions, stereos, building materials, etc. We could base our economy on things of value. We could rise in morality and ethics to a point where the idea of making money by financial speculation becomes an abomination to any upright citizen with even a smattering of civic conscience.

We will do it. Either by choice or by necessity.

You see, the financial way of making money, this casino capitalism, when applied to a society as large is a disaster that unfolds over the years. It hollows out a society diverting the money that would have built manufacturing and countless other useful investment, diverting the young from useful and productive enterprise and diverting the attention of society away from the important endeavors of life and nation building and into a life of profit based on speculation. Why work, when you can gamble with other people’s money?

When this cardboard edifice falls, once again we will find virtue in the making of value.

James Pilant

Gael O’Brien Reviews The Documentary – “Inside Job”

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, Economic measurement, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, White Collar Crime5 Comments

From the article –

While of course we know the outcome of the unfolding events Ferguson describes, his interviews with many of the players in the crisis provide additional insight into the larger question of how could so many very bright people be involved in a failure so huge? The film shows the consequences when thought capital is wrapped around the dogged pursuit of an ideology, in this case deregulation, so that conflicting data or opposing viewpoints are not allowed to interfere.

The band of men from Ivy League economics departments wielded a lot of power in the 30-year push for deregulation. They served as consultants to the industry and were selected for significant regulatory or White House advisor positions. Ferguson raises questions about their objectivity as scholars, as well as whether their integrity was compromised by conflicts of interest and accepting fees from Wall Street, or to testify before Congress, or as expert witnesses.

I’ve already written a recommendation style review of the documentary and this one is very positive as well.

You need to read it to get the full flavor of O’Brien’s prose.

James Pilant

Is A 398,264.69 Square Foot House Big Enough For You Or A Bit Much?

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Philosophy of Business

It’s bigger the the French Palace at Versailles. (Versailles is pictured at the left.)

Its price tag – One billion dollars (American).

Location – Mumbai

Owner – The Richest Man in India – Mukesh Ambani.

Named Anitlla, the entire structure is 27 stories high, although to be fair the first 6 floors are a 160-car garage.

From CBS Moneywatch –

The amenities are as extravagant as they are endless, but what would you expect from the fourth richest human on the planet? The most expensive house in the world has:

* Private gym
* Ballroom
* 50-seat movie theater
* Health spa
* Several swimming pools
* 3 helicopter pads

The house, well, building, also features small trees in the residence in an elevated garden with high ceilings.

Why?

I just don’t get it. (There’s room for 600 servants.) I don’t think I am ever going to get it.

Don’t be mistaken I don’t believe that he should give it all to charity, but isn’t there a point at which diminishing returns kicks in? I mean after the first 100,000 square feet, wasn’t there a pause? And then didn’t someone think at least in the back of their mind, “This is crazy?!”

Well, probably not. But I still don’t understand.

James Pilant

The Dumbest Quote for the Day

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, Teaching3 Comments

I teach in Northwest Arkansas. Students here tend to feel that because they are from Arkansas and go to a small college that they are going to have trouble competing with students from name schools. I always tell them that they are just as smart as students from anywhere in the country. As evidence of this, I point to the litany of stupidity, overreaching and greed by these graduates of name universities in the banking industy.

Well today, I got a new quote to use:

It’s not a surprise that we know we have crises every five or ten years. My daughter came home from school one day and said, ‘daddy, what’s a financial crisis?’ And without trying to be funny, I said, ‘it’s the type of thing that happens every five, ten, seven, years.’ And she said: ‘why is everybody so surprised?’ So we shouldn’t be surprised…

This is from JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimion. That’s right. You heard it clearly. This financial crisis is just “the type of thing that happens every five, ten, etc.” Do you mean the financial crisis that destroyed a large proportion of the value of American homes, came within an inch of destroying the international banking system and has put millions of people out of work? That one? It seems to me the others were a lot smaller – much, much, much smaller. I hope he is better in other aspects of teaching his children. The story of Santa Claus has more validity.

Mr. Dimion has an MBA from Harvard Business School. You see, my students are just as smart as their students. The evidence is clear. I don’t think I could get any of my students to claim that the current financial crisis is a kind of “seasonal” phenomenon and that we shouldn’t be surprised when the elite educated bankers screw up on in a manner barely conceivable in fiction.

James Pilant

(First published in January of this year.)

RECORD FINES = WHAT PATHETIC NONSENSE!!

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Government Failure, White Collar Crime

From the BBC –

Angelo Mozilo will pay the Securities and Exchange Commission $22.5m (£14.1m) and repay $45m of profits.

He is the highest profile executive to face charges relating to the US sub-prime mortgage crisis in 2007.

The SEC alleged he, with two colleagues, had failed to disclose risks that Countrywide was taking.

The civil charges related to claims he had misled the market by falsely assuring investors that Countrywide was a prime quality mortgage lender that had avoided the excesses of its competitors.

From 2001-2006, his compensation was 470 million dollars.

This is what passes for justice.

This is supposed to send a message.

This is supposed to be a nation under laws.

This is rubbish.

James Pilant

Do The Banks Have Proof Of Ownership?

On By southwerkIn business ethics, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, White Collar Crime

I’m not the only one who has suspicions that the banks might not have the necessary proof of ownership. Read the following from the Wall Street Journal –

Under a far gloomier scenario, the problems created by using robo-signers may be irrelevant if, instead of being lost, mortgage documents weren’t ever properly transferred during each step of the securitization process, says Adam Levitin, a professor of law at Georgetown University. If that happens, “the whole system comes to a halt,” he says. Investors could argue in court that they never owned the mortgages backing their money-losing securities.

Banks and their attorneys say such fears are overblown. Procedures for transferring loans into mortgage-backed securities “are sound and based on a well-established body of law governing a multi-trillion dollar secondary mortgage market,” said Tom Deutsch, the executive director of the American Securitization Forum, in a statement Friday.

I love that second paragraph. Here look at the key phrase, “Procedures for transferring loans into mortgage backed securities are sound and based on well established law…” Wow, you’d think the founding fathers were doing it! Well, this vast body of jurisprudence has existed since that grand old year of history, 2002? I doubt if any of it has been tested in court. His statement is more hopeful than true. You see the transfer of property is one of the most important procedures in the law. It’s surrounded over and over again by legal protections many of them requiring specific procedures. Now, you might ask me if during the Go Go years of financial mismanagement, the mid years of the first decade of this century, that the banks and their mortgage creating boiler rooms did all that proper procedure? Not a chance. Not even a little chance.

Some of the mortgage companies were giving out mortgages with NO capital of their own and Wall Street still bought them. If you’re giving people mortgages with not a single cent of your money on the line, how much do you care about good paperwork?

James Pilant

Tax Breaks to Encourage Individual Poverty-Fighters? (via Get Aktiv)

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, Philosophy of Business2 Comments

Get Aktiv is out there with a different kind of idea. He wants domestic tax deductions in return for investing in the developing countries. This would re-distribute money from the first world to the third on a voluntary basis. It’s an interesting idea. Give it a read.

Tax Breaks to Encourage Individual Poverty-Fighters? Extreme poverty is, well, an extreme issue – and it requires extreme commitment and creativity to address it. I'm always reading other people's works, visiting developing countries, and basically trying to soak up and synthesise as much knowledge and experience as I can. In continuing my reading of Creative Capitalism, edited by Michael Kinsley, I've just encountered a fresh idea I hadn't considered before and I believe it warrants serious consid … Read More

via Get Aktiv

Will Congress Save The Banks By Dismissing The Ownership Rights Of Homeowners? – Senior Editor, John Carney Says They Will

On By southwerkIn business ethics, Capitalism, ethics, Government Failure, Philosophy of Business, Uncategorized

I’m cynical. You can’t have much to do with the field of business ethics and be anything else. I was outraged for days after Congress passed the act that would have legalized much of the mortgage industry’s wrong doing. When Obama vetoed it, I had a rare moment of gratitude. But I’m still cynical always waiting for the knife in the back, a sell out, a deal behind close doors … There is always someone waiting to make a deal no matter what crawling excreted maggot they have to deal with. Always someone.

But this guy is more cynical than I am. And he might be right. John Carney in an article entitled, “Sorry Folks, The Put-Back Apocalypse Ain’t Gonna Happen,” says that Congress will not let Bank of American get in real trouble.

Here’s an excerpt from this article –

But Bank of America’s recent decline—down almost 10% this week—is driven by fears that the bank could be hit with huge liabilities for faulty mortgage pools. And I’m pretty sure that is not going to happen.

Why not?

Because the politicians will not let the financial stability of the largest bank in the nation be threatened by contractual rights. Not when there’s an easy fix available that won’t cost taxpayers a dime.

Here’s what is going to happen: Congress will pass a law called something like “The Financial Modernization and Stability Act of 2010” that will retroactively grant mortgage pools the rights in the underlying mortgages that people are worried about. All the screwed up paperwork, lost notes, unassigned security interests will be forgiven by a legislative act.

He may be right. I’ll bet the other way. Fifty state Attorney Generals and countless other officials are on the prowl right now and bad stuff is coming out every minute. The Public is in a bad mood. Saving the banks under these circumstances could delegitimize our system of government in a way we haven’t seen before. It is true that people have virtually no faith in Congress and only somewhat more in the President. But that is different from active hate. It’s different because the government will essentially be putting a sign on its front lawn, “You have a dispute with a bank and you’re right – WRONG, bank wins. You’re less than nothing. Go home and suck it up.”

I don’t think that’s going to go over well. Further, I don’t think it will go away in time for 2012.

We’re about to see how much power public opinion has. John Carney says it does not have the power to stop Congress from saving the bank by abrogating their legal rights. Carney hopes he’s wrong about this. From his work, it is easy to see that he is no defender of the banking industry and, is probably, one of those people I speak of as a ally in the “good fight.” But I hope he is wrong too.

The possibilities of the results of such an action by the federal government offer only two possibilities, acceptance by the public or another kind of response. I am not happy with my speculations on what that response might be.

James Pilant