Non Monetary Penalties?

A top Treasury department official said Thursday that the government has still not imposed any fines on banks that do not comply with the Obama administration’s mortgage modification program.

In testimony before a House Financial Services subcommittee, Phyllis Caldwell, chief of Treasury’s Homeownership Preservation Office, said her department has pursued “non-monetary remedies” but has not actually imposed any fines on banks for not complying with the administration’s flagship $50 billion foreclosure prevention program.

I have a video explaining how the HAMP program works for consumers. You will see that it is brutal. The main reason it is brutal is the banks do not have to negotiate in good faith. They can simply decide not to agree. The treasury led by our indomitable Phillis Caldwell (twenty years in the banking industry) hasn’t even set up guidelines for the banks to pay back the money they took from the government. So, if the bank voluntarily offered to give the money back, they wouldn’t know how to do it. By the way, it’s almost two years and they still haven’t got the rules in place. Nevertheless, I think their priorities are right where they want them, Consumers second (dead last) and banks first.

Still, Treasury has not yet punished these banks in any significant way. “To date we have not gone back to take back incentives that have already been paid, but we have pursued many of the non-monetary remedies, including further actions and evaluations, and re-evaluations,” Caldwell told Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), chair of the subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, after Waters repeatedly asked her if she had “levied any penalties or sanctions.”
Even in the midst of a growing controversy over allegedly fraudulent foreclosure paperwork, Treasury has not imposed any penalties on banks.

The difference between how the banks are regulated under HAMP as opposed to how the homeowner is regulated is staggering. The HAMP program simply has no rules for recovering federal money paid to banks who refuse to cooperate. On the other hand, the banks can mercilessly stack fees on the homeowner and foreclose on his home after the trial period. Essentially a bank makes money both by getting federal funds from the program and then forcing the homeowner into foreclosure.

James Pilant

Will New Technology Fix The TSA Scandal?

What if you could walk through that airport body scanner, pause for the camera, and know that your naked image would never be pored over by human eyes? If it was software, not TSA screeners, who searched you and other passengers for possible explosives?

That’s the vision of Transportation Security Administration head John Pistole. At a Senate hearing yesterday, Georgia Republican Johnny Isakson conjured this future and suggested to Pisole, “It looks like technology can be a solution to the privacy issue.” Pistole responded, “I think so, I’m very hopeful in that regard.”

The lead two paragraphs from an Atlantic Monthly story written by Alexis Madrigal. Mr. Madrigal them goes on to explain why this is probably never going to happen.

From the article

While vendors like L-3 and Rapiscan are actively trying to come up with a magic technological solution for the TSA, independent experts on body scanning technology and automated threat detection aren’t nearly as optimistic as the TSA head. Setting aside the question of how much real safety would be afforded by body scanners that use algorithms to detect artfully hidden explosives under someone’s clothes (I’ll leave it to our big guns to debate that point), there are fundamental problems that may make it very difficult to deploy them.

This is an excellent description of how the technology used in scanning works. I heartily recommend it.

There is no magic bullet.

Currently our actions are terrorist driven. Have one terrorist hide an explosive near his genitals and suddenly millions of Americans are having the genitals groped by the unfriendly hand of the government.

Tell me, what are we going to do if a terrorist hides the explosive more internally? Do you really want to meet your friendly TSA employee while he’s putting on the rubber gloves?

Let’s stop the nonsense now.

James Pilant

Banks Investigated For Fraud!

I’m not holding my breath.

From the Associated Press

The federal government has opened criminal investigations into approximately 50 executives and directors of U.S. banks that have collapsed during the financial crisis.

Deputy Inspector General Fred Gibson said Wednesday the inspector general’s office at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. has been probing the role of the executives in bank failures around the country.

The criminal investigations are separate from civil lawsuits approved by the FDIC’s board against some 80 bank executives, employees and directors. The FDIC is seeking to recoup about $2 billion in bank losses that the regulator says were the result of negligence or misconduct by executives or directors.

The FDIC has shut down or seized 311 banks since January 2008 at a cost of around $77 billion. The criminal probes were reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal.

2008!! What was the hurry? They waited two full years and suddenly woke up morning and thought, “Hey, these banks collapsed. I wonder if something could be wrong?”

Whenever a bank collapses, some alarm bells should go off.

Let me give them some advice, when 100 banks fail, criminality is likely. No, that number is not 311, it’s 100. If you wait until the number is 311, you might appear to be foolish or unwilling to prosecute bank fraud.

James Pilant

Debt Collectors Are Using Facebook!

From the Associated Press

A Florida woman claims a debt collector went far beyond the usual phone calls in an attempt to recoup $362 for an unpaid car loan by sending her messages on Facebook — and by telling family on the social networking site to have her call the agency.

Melanie Beacham, who is suing the debt collection agency Mark One LLC in a Florida court, said she never expected to hear from a collection agency on Facebook, which she used to talk to loved ones and post the occasional photo or funny status update.

“I was shocked when I found out these collectors used Facebook to contact my family because they knew exactly where I was,” Beacham, 34, told The Associated Press in an e-mail on Thursday. “I’m angry they caused me so much embarrassment with my family.”

When will it stop? It probably will not. Now, that they have established that they can humiliate people, they’ve struck gold.

The federal government is the only power who can defend us from this kind of abuse. Without 50 state authority, any legislation at the state level is hit or miss.

But the federal government is a protector of large companies in almost all cases. It is little inclined to act in the public’s behalf and barely representative of the people.

You can see from the current controversy over airport scanners how little concerned they get over a public problem. An industry problem causes them to jump to attention and perform. A financial industry problem has them barking like a trained seal.

Where do we go for help?

James Pilant

Get Rid Of TSA (Transportation Safety Administration)

If they don’t have the brains to change course when they are obviously wrong. Yes, it’s time to become a relic of history, a monument to fear, stupidity and official indifference.

From the Associated Press

In a climate of Internet campaigns to shun airport pat-downs and veteran pilots suing over their treatment by government screeners, some airports are considering another way to show dissatisfaction: Ditching TSA agents altogether.

Federal law allows airports to opt for screeners from the private sector instead. The push is being led by a powerful Florida congressman who’s a longtime critic of the Transportation Security Administration and counts among his campaign contributors some of the companies who might take the TSA’s place.

Furor over airline passenger checks has grown as more airports have installed scanners that produce digital images of the body’s contours, and the anger intensified when TSA added a more intrusive style of pat-down recently for those who opt out of the full-body scans. Some travelers are using the Internet to organize protests aimed at the busy travel days next week surrounding Thanksgiving.

Let’s stop routine doses of radiation.

Let’s stop the pointless groping of our genitals.

Let’s stop the pretensions of serving the public while instead encouraging a climate of fear to induce compliance.

The TSA is there to serve the public not to hold us in contempt, not to treat us like hardened criminals in a maximum security prison. (The only thing they are missing is body cavity searches.)

They have never caught a terrorist. Never.

James Pilant

TSA (Transportation Security Administration) ABUSES – How Many Before Someone Does Something?

Tell me. How many terrorists has the TSA caught?

Hmm, would that be zero?

Oh yeah, that’s the number.

So, why are we stripping you with technology or groping you up?

I don’t know. Maybe you should ask?

James Pilant

Once Again, Joe Lieberman Defends Boarding Pat Downs

Joe Lieberman justifies groping airline passengers.

Where do we stop?

Can anybody, anywhere explain this to me?

James Pilant

Joe Lieberman Wants You To Be Patted Down

The web site Firedoglake put this little video together. They really don’t like Joe. Of course, I loath him, so I have no problem with putting this up.

Once again, Lieberman supports intrusions into your privacy.

Do you like what you saw?

Don’t let the government treat you like this. This is insane.

James Pilant

Who Owns Your Mortgage? Or Anybody’s For That Matter!

Dan Edstrom is a specialist. He performs securitization audits.

He decided to use his specialized training to discover who owned his mortgage.

The chart below is the result.

Do you know who owns your mortgage? Could you figure it out like he has?

From the article

The following flow chart reverse engineers the mortgage on the Ekstrom family residence. It took Dan over one year to take it this far and it clearly demonstrates what happens when there are too many lawyers being manufactured.

You can click on it and it gets bigger.

Do I need to point out to you that with what has been happening with mortgages over the last five years, it might be unwise to allow banks to have someone sign off that they understand the account?

James Pilant

Jason Michael McCann/homophilosophicus Comments On My Post – No More X-Rated Searches!!@!

I met Jason Michael McCann online. He teaches in Ireland. He is a philosopher. Here he is commenting on my blog post – “No More X-Rated Searches!!@!” (He has a wonderful blog, homophilosophicus, and if you don’t read it you are missing out on the works of a learned and thoughtful man.)

As Christians also, Dear James, we have a moral obligation to preserve the dignity of others. Without doubt there is the question of a trade-off between the perceived need for security and human dignity. My fear is that this too may be related to the circle; a refusal on the part of security keepers to acknowledge respect to the human person may fuel the need for security.

Jason Michael

He is absolutely right. There is a Christian duty here. We have a duty to God and man to act with respect and kindness to blameless others. We are failing in this.

These searches are indicative of a wider malaise in our society. Our willingness to accept any means to thwart a possible terrorist attack is turning us into shadows of human beings. We are so frightened we are unable to say stop without being attacked for “strengthening” the terrorists.

These searches are wrong.

These searches are an example of this nation losing its way.

We are better than this.

Tell me, if there is a terrorist attack at a grade school, are we going to pat down every six year old, run them through a magnetic resonance machine? What about at a federal building, the Statehouse, the Governor’s Mansion, County Courthouses? Are we going to get “felt” up everywhere we go? every bank? every factory? Where does the fear end? ever?

Should we start building bunkers in our backyards, stocking up a years supply of canned goods?

Is that where I live? Is that the moral fiber of my fellow citizens? To be led around by the nose like cattle because we’re afraid?

Are we like the cowardly lion, possessed of a half trillion dollar defense, but never feeling safe?

When do we start living with courage?

We don’t have to live like this.

James Pilant